We were 16 then. Self-obsessed. Presumptious. Nonchalant. And like all other 16-year olds - rebellious. It was no wonder that when she would walk into our lives, we would only be skeptical. Specially when you have to fill up a pretty long shoe.
Till that time our idea of a teacher was quite different from what she offered. We looked up to them to protect us, to stand up for us, to tell us where we should go, what we should do. They were conventional in thought, they discouraged indiscipline, they did not encourage an independent thought. They were prim and proper and they were good at their job. Above all, they loved us. Though we hardly saw an expression of that in our interactions. And more so, if you did not set the marksheets on fire.
But Sipra Basu changed all of that. And something more.
She was a lady of uncharacteristic strength, of profound dignity and an unflinching confidence in her own sense of judgment. Brutally honest and genuinely concerned about the well being of her students. Being a teacher of history she harboured no such adulation towards the general leftist tendencies of Mughal glorification or of the typical rightist unadulterated reverence of Gandhi.
You had to respect her guts. If she did not believe in something and you were on her side, she would defend herself and in turn teach you,unconsciously, to defend yourself. But she would never defend you. It was sort of her principled stand that in life you will have to fend for yourself and your battles are your own and only yours to fight and win. If not win, at least fight. She was by no means a free thinker. She was as conventional as any of her age and time. She would not approve of many things and to this day she still sticks to them. But she would never ask you to go by her ideas. Disapproval meant censure in the strictest possible terms but did not imply conformance.
It is unfortunate that such people are under serious threat of extinction. They don't make them like them anymore. My parents had the privilege of having their son come in contact with such a person. But would their son be that privileged ? If not, then his task becomes that much more difficult. Because he knows the role she played. In his life.
6 comments:
Ah, finally a post that I understand!!!
our history teacher made us memorize WW-I dates... sigh...
glad to know that you were luckier...
PS: rightists adore Gandhi?? I thot BJP was the rightist in India... or am I confused as usual?
Vijay:
WW-I !!!! THAT is history !
The original rightist, if ever there was one in India was the Congress. It is a different matter that they have ceased to be so now.
And the BJP does like Mohandas. Not his muslim appeasement policy but surely his efforts at consolidation of the Hindu fold.
everything was fine till the last paragraph... is this a post about your teacher or some attempt at trying to get some message to your inner self ? or to others?
@ monk:
you make the mistake of attempting to understand EVERYTHING hirok writes...
if u can make sense of half the post, u r in highly intellectual company (read: ME)... dont be too ambitious...
Ranga:
As Arun Shourie had said at SP - "Why should it be either/or, why cannot it be and/also?"
Vijay:
I need to brush up - my standard is going down. You are able to understand my writing - cause for concern !
you can always go back to your 'looking for love, but want freedom from love' kinda posts...
it is not a reflection on the standard...
Post a Comment